LogoLogo
  • Learn about Balancer
  • Background
    • Team Goal
  • Fundamentals
    • White Paper
      • The Value Function
        • USDC WETH WBTC 33/33/33
        • BAL WETH 80/20
        • Price Change Proof
      • Spot & Effective Price
        • Spot Price
        • Effective Price
        • Price Impact
        • Price Impact - With Swap Fees
      • Trading Formulas
        • Out-Given-In
          • Including Swap Fees
        • In-Given-Out
          • Including Swap Fees
        • In-Given-Price
          • In-Given-Price Proof
          • Arbitrage 80/20
          • Arbitrage 50/50
        • Summary
      • Deposits & Withdrawals
        • Deposits
          • Proportional Deposits
            • BAL / WETH 80/20
          • Single Sided Deposits
            • Price Impact; 10,000 BAL
            • Price Impact; 100,000 BAL
          • Multi-token Deposits
            • Price Impact WMATIC / MTA / WETH
            • Price Impact [2] WMATIC / MTA / WETH
        • Withdrawals
          • Proportional Withdrawals
            • BAL/WETH 80/20
          • Singled Sided Withdrawals
            • Withdrawal Price Impact
    • Impermanent Loss
      • 50/50 Pools
      • 80/20 Pools
      • Multi-token Pools
    • veBAL Tokenomics
      • TLDR
      • Vote-Escrowed Governance
      • Financial Implications
        • Boosting BAL Incentives
          • Minimum veBAL for Max Boost
          • Maximum Boost
          • Calculating my Boost
          • Boost Delegation for Contract Wallet
        • Protocol Revenue Distribution
        • Gauge Voting
      • Inflation Schedule
      • veBAL FAQ
  • More Information
    • For Developers
      • GitHub Integration
    • For Support
    • References & Related Content
  • Documented Questions
    • Coming soon
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Fundamentals
  2. Impermanent Loss

80/20 Pools

Here we will examine the same circumstance as shown in the 50/50 Pools example to compare what effect a change in pool weights can have on a liquidity provider's investment.

Previous50/50 PoolsNextMulti-token Pools

Last updated 3 years ago

Was this helpful?

COMP WETH 80/20

To emphasize the weighting of 80 / 20 as opposed to 50/50 we will observe impermanent loss under the COMP favoring pool conditions to display the benefits of uneven pool weightings. We will in turn hold 1 WETH @ $2000.00 each and 32 COMP @ $250.00 each. ($8000 in COMP and $2000 in WETH).

Our gains will then be determined by the invariant ratio. This can be used for our token balances are well.

Here we can consider the USD values to be the same in the numerator and denominator therefore not needed to determine the ratio between the two.

While impermanent loss is still applicable in this scenario in comparison to the 50/50 pool the losses are nearly cut in half (a factor of 0.5825 more precisely). When dealing with very large investments these small amounts can make a large difference in value and ultimately weighting will protect or expose investors from impermanent loss depending on their choices. However if prices return to their initial state or follow the same price change at a certain point the “losses” will revert to zero regardless of weighting.